This article primarily majors on the nature of relations in a family where there is a form of disability. As the article points out, there is very little literature dwelling on the issue of disabilities and its effect on the contemporary families. In addition, the author acknowledges that the rate of disability in the United States is significant and also across the world. The article explores how contemporary families welcome disabled children into their families, factors that uphold utmost quality of family life in such families, how parents who are disabled play their roles as spouses or parents and other important aspects related to the subject. The article is rather enlightening and well written for easy comprehension.
Personally, I find the flow in the article as well as the arguments made to be quite informed. The information provided herein is aimed at helping contemporary families which may be facing the challenge at hand, sociologists or even family therapists. As such, the language used herein is comprehensive for the targeted group of readers. In such families, it is certain that there will be numerous challenges. True to human beings, they always find a way to cope and adapt to such situations. In this case, the author principal goal was to evaluate how such families adapt to such challenges. Moreover, an essay writer from explores how the challenges may differ across racially and ethnically diverse families. The author derives the conclusion that poverty is a prevalent characteristic in families struggling with disabilities as compared to other families in the general population. Significantly, the economic hardships experienced in such families are more adverse in families which are led by single-parents, and hail from a minority group. As compared to normal families, military families coping with the same situation have proven to be resilient. Some of the disabilities mentioned in the article encompass cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, genetic syndromes and pervasive developmental disorder. Parents attending to children with varying disabilities were surveyed to evaluate the amount of stress encountered by each as they attend to their parenting roles. Those whose children suffer from Down syndrome are said to have exhibited lower stress levels in terms of parent-child interactions. Either way, it is not any easier for them to cope with the challenge.
One of the factors that I find intriguing herein is the mentioned population-based carrier screening. As stated, this would help evaluate and inform couples aspiring to be parents on the likelihood of them getting children who may have substantial developmental conditions or health conditions. However, the researchers who encourage the screening do not necessarily identify the people who should undergo the screening process and the conditions under which it should be done as the author has pointed out. Additionally, there is no guarantee that those with access to fewer resources can afford the screening services. Evidently, such screening may be helpful in reducing the race of disability not only in the United States but also worldwide. However, further research should be done to ensure more effectiveness and efficiency of the process as well as affordability. Though the author fails to outline a list of articles reviewed, it is evident that the literature reviewed in the article is rather wide. This makes the information given here reliable and credible. However, the article acknowledges that the information provided herein does not represent the standing of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.